Sager v. Tupper
Michigan Supreme Court
Error to Kalamazoo. Assumpsit. The facts are in the opinion.
1Opinion of the CourtMarston, J.
Plaintiff in error brought assumpsit against defendants in error for the recovery of money paid out, materials furnished and work and labor done by the plaintiff for the defendants, amounting in all to about the sum of seven hundred and fifty dollars.
The defendants pleaded the general issue, with a notice of set-off; they also gave notice that they would show and insist in their defense, that if any such promises were made as plaintiff in his declaration alleged, they were made by the defendant Nelson Tupper, in consideration that plaintiff would at his own cost and *261expense furnish certain…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Sisson v. Cleveland & Toledo RailroadMichigan Supreme Court · 1866
- Manhattan Brass & Manufacturing Co. v. SearsNew York Court of Appeals · 1871
- Waterman v. WatermanMichigan Supreme Court · 1876
- Hinman v. LittellMichigan Supreme Court · 1871
- People ex rel. Attorney General v. Lake Superior Ship Canal, Railroad & Iron Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1875
3Cited by4 opinions
- Dutcher v. BuckMichigan Supreme Court · 1893
- Dumanoise v. TownsendMichigan Supreme Court · 1890
- Peter v. ThickstunMichigan Supreme Court · 1883
- Marks v. Hardy's Admr.Court of Appeals of Kentucky · 1904