Legal Opinion

Dumanoise v. Townsend

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided April 25, 1890PublishedCited by 7 opinions

Error to Genesee. (Newton, J.) Assumpsit. Plaintiff brings error. The facts are stated in the opinion.

1Opinion of the CourtChamplin, C. J.

This action was brought to recover a balance claimed by plaintiff to be due to him from defendants for hauling black-walnut logs, and loading black-walnut lumber upon a car. The plaintiff claimed a joint liability on the part of defendants. Townsend defended, denying all liability.

The plaintiff introduced testimony which tended to show that defendants were partners in the purchase of certain black-walnut logs of different farmers in the vicinity of Davison, a station on the Chicago & Grand Trunk Railway, where a saw-mill was located, and in the pianufacture of such logs into lumber, and the…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Sager v. TupperMichigan Supreme Court · 1878

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Stayton State BankOregon Supreme Court · 1916
  2. Iowa Lillooet Gold Min. Co. v. BlissU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Northern Iowa · 1906
  3. Streichen v. FehleisenSupreme Court of Iowa · 1900
  4. Wolfenbarger v. BrittNebraska Supreme Court · 1921
  5. Bloom v. McPhee & McGinnity Co.Colorado Court of Appeals · 1914

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API