Legal Opinion

Dutcher v. Buck

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided June 23, 1893PublishedCited by 10 opinions

Error to Kent. (Grove, J.) Assumpsit. Plaintiff brings error. The facts are stated in the opinion.

1Opinion of the CourtMcGrath, J.

This is assumpsit, originally brought in justice’s court, for work and labor.

The court below made the following findings:

“In the spring of 1889 the defendant was the owner of 840 acres of land in Charlevoix county, in this State. About the 6th of March, 1889, he made the following agreement with one Arthur Leclear: The said Leclear was to go on the defendant’s land, and cut logs and bolts, and market and sell and receive payment for the same. He was to pay the expenses of the job, pay the defendant $1.00 a thousand stumpage for logs, and 25 cts. a cord for bolts. He was to furnish the use of…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Beecher v. BushMichigan Supreme Court · 1881
  2. Loomis v. MarshallSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1837
  3. Smith v. . BodineNew York Court of Appeals · 1878
  4. Vanderburgh v. Hull & BowneNew York Supreme Court · 1838
  5. Whitcomb v. ConverseMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1875

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Keiswetter v. RubensteinMichigan Supreme Court · 1926
  2. McIntosh v. Detroit Savings BankMichigan Supreme Court · 1929
  3. Brotherton v. GilchristMichigan Supreme Court · 1906
  4. Canton Bridge Co. v. City of Eaton RapidsMichigan Supreme Court · 1895
  5. Moore v. DubardMichigan Supreme Court · 1947

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API