Legal Opinion

People ex rel. Attorney General v. Lake Superior Ship Canal, Railroad & Iron Co.

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided June 15, 1875PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Information in tho nature of a Quo Warranto.

1Opinion of the Court

CAMPBELL, J :

This information was filed to determine the right of. the respondent corporation to collect the tolls on the Portage *235Ship Canal. The only question presented is, in whose custody was it contemplated that the canal should remain after its completion. It is claimed on behalf of the prosecution, that the possession of it is to be in the state as a trustee for the United States, and by the respondent, that the canal company is to possess it. There is no question on either side but that the tolls are to be fixed by the laws and authority of the state.

The history of the enterprise as…

2Cited by3 opinions

  1. Sager v. TupperMichigan Supreme Court · 1878
  2. Manistee River Improvement Co. v. SandsMichigan Supreme Court · 1884
  3. Rogers v. Port Huron & Lake Michigan RailroadMichigan Supreme Court · 1881

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API