Legal Opinion

Weinfeld v. Paine, Webber, Jackson & Curtis

District Court, D. Massachusetts

Decided February 20, 1961No. Civ. A. No. 60-899-FPublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

FRANCIS J. W. FORD, District Judge.

This is an action by customers of defendants, a partnership engaged in business as dealers in securities and as stockbrokers, to recover losses alleged to have resulted from improper handling of plaintiffs’ account. The original complaint sets out diversity of citizenship as the basis for jurisdiction in this court. Defendants have moved to dismiss, and plaintiffs have moved to amend the complaint to add an allegation that the action “also arises as a result of the ‘Commodity Exchange Act.’ ”

Plaintiffs are citizens of Massachusetts. Defendants are a…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Great Southern Fire Proof Hotel Company v. JonesSupreme Court of the United States · 1899
  2. Grant County Deposit Bank v. McCampbellCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1952
  3. Darby v. Philadelphia Transp. Co.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1947
  4. Remington's Dairy v. Rutland Ry. Corp.District Court, D. Vermont · 1954
  5. Simpson v. De VaultDistrict Court, W.D. Virginia · 1959

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Goodman v. H. Hentz & Co.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 1967
  2. Hereth v. JonesDistrict Court, E.D. Virginia · 1982
  3. Consumers Savings Bank v. Touche Ross & Co.District Court, D. Massachusetts · 1985

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API