Darby v. Philadelphia Transp. Co.
District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
GANEY, District Judge.
This is a motion to dismiss a complaint for damages for personal injuries resulting from defendants’ alleged negligence, brought by a citizen of South Carolina, against the Philadelphia Transportation Company, a corporation, James Wilson and William R. Ross, residents of Pennsylvania, and Margaret Koch, a resident of Delaware, individually and trading as Ross and Wilson, a partnership with its principal place of business in Philadelphia, on the grounds that the complaint does not (1) allege diversity of citizenship, and (2) the venue is improperly laid.
The complaint…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Camp v. GressSupreme Court of the United States · 1919
- Sperry Products, Inc. v. Association of American RailroadsCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1942
- Busby v. Electric Utilities Employees UnionSupreme Court of the United States · 1944
- Bowles v. Marx Hide & Tallow Co.District Court, W.D. Kentucky · 1945
- The Scow" 6-S."Supreme Court of the United States · 1919
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Rutland Railway Corporation v. Brotherhood of Locomotive EngineersCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1962
- X-L Liquors, Inc. v. TaylorSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1955
- Eastern Motor Express, Inc. v. EspenshadeDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1956
- Korff v. G AND G CORP.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1956
- JOSCAR COMPANY v. Consolidated Sun Ray, Inc.District Court, E.D. New York · 1963
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.