Consumers Savings Bank v. Touche Ross & Co.
District Court, D. Massachusetts
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION AND ORDER
WOLF, District Judge.
Upon consideration of the stipulated facts, the evidence presented by affidavit, and the memoranda and oral arguments of counsel, plaintiffs’ Motion for Remand is hereby granted. Plaintiffs’ request for payment of its costs in connection with this motion, which apparently raises an issue of first impression in the District of Massachusetts, is hereby denied.
This action was brought in February, 1985 by plaintiffs Consumers Savings Bank, CSB Financial Corp. and General Investment Company, Inc. against defendants Touche Ross & Co. (“Touche Ross”) and…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Navarro Savings Assn. v. LeeSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Great Southern Fire Proof Hotel Company v. JonesSupreme Court of the United States · 1899
- United Steelworkers of America v. R. H. Bouligny, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1965
- Chapman v. BarneySupreme Court of the United States · 1889
- Colonial Realty Corporation v. Bache & Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1966
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Eastern Corporate Federal Credit Union v. Peat, Marwick, Mitchell & Co.District Court, D. Massachusetts · 1986
- Lindner Dividend Fund, Inc. v. Ernst & YoungDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 1995
- Murphy v. GutfreundDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1985
- Peerless Insurance v. Aetna Casualty & Surety Co.District Court, D. New Hampshire · 1990
- Nelson & Small, Inc. v. Polaris Industries Partners, L.P.District Court, D. Maine · 1989
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.