Legal Opinion
Associated Container Transportation (Australia) Ltd. v. United States
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided December 4, 1980No. 80 Civ. 4291 (CLB); 80 Civ. 4307 (CLB); 80 Civ. 4326 (CLB)PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
BRIEANT, District Judge.
Although these actions are filed by different plaintiffs under separate docket numbers, they arise from a single antitrust investigation and seek identical relief. All three plaintiffs name Hon. Sanford M.' Litvak, Assistant Attorney General, and the United States of America as party-defendants. Farrell Lines, Inc. also names Roger W. Fones, an attorney for the Department of Justice as a Defendant. The discovery motions discussed below were argued together, and the Court will address the issues presented in all three cases together.
Petitioners are members, inter alia,…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- James Allen Budde v. Ling-Temco-Vought, Inc., D/B/A Kentron Hawaii, Ltd.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1975
- Petition of Gold Bond Stamp CompanyDistrict Court, D. Minnesota · 1963
- Hyster Company v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1964
- Gold Bond Stamp Company v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1964
- H. L. Moore Drug Exchange, Inc. v. Smith, Kline & French LaboratoriesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1967
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- State Ex Rel. Palumbo v. Graley's Body Shop, Inc.West Virginia Supreme Court · 1992
- Associated Container Transportation (Australia) Ltd. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1983
- Finnell v. United States Department of JusticeDistrict Court, D. Kansas · 1982
- United States v. WitmerDistrict Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 1993
- MacCaferri Gabions, Inc. v. United StatesDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 1995
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.