Legal Opinion
Petition of Gold Bond Stamp Company
District Court, D. Minnesota
Decided August 9, 1963No. 4-62 Civil 369PublishedCited by 33 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
NORDBYE, District Judge.
This cause came before the Court on a petition by the Gold Bond Stamp Company under Section 5(b) of the Antitrust Civil Process Act, 15 U.S.C.A. §§ 1311-1314, hereafter referred to as the Act, for an order modifying or setting aside a Civil Investigative Demand served upon it by the Assistant Attorney General in charge of the Antitrust Division of the Department of Justice.
The petitioner contends that the demand should be modified or set aside upon the grounds that (1) it fails to define the “nature of the conduct” under investigation and the “provision of law…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Landis v. North American Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1936
- Boyd v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1886
- Weeks v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1914
- Silverthorne Lumber Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1920
- United States v. Procter & Gamble Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1958
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by33 opinions
- Matanuska Maid, Inc. v. StateAlaska Supreme Court · 1980
- Evans v. StateUtah Supreme Court · 1998
- United States v. Ronald P. MarkwoodCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1995
- Hyster Company v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1964
- Gold Bond Stamp Company v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1964
28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.