Legal Opinion
Hyster Company v. United States
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided November 4, 1964No. 19168_1PublishedCited by 31 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
DUNIWAY, Circuit Judge.
Hyster Company attacks the constitutionality of the Antitrust Civil Process Act (76 Stat. 548, 15 U.S.C. §§ 1311-1314, Supp. 4, (1963)), and of a “civil investigative demand” issued under the Act and served upon Hyster. It also is claimed that the demand is invalid for non-compliance with the Act. The trial court upheld the Act and the demand in all respects. We are affirming.
The action was brought under section 5(b) of the Act (15 U.S.C. § 1314(b)). The petition has attached to it a copy of the demand, and alleges that it was received by Hyster on April 16, 1963, by…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Hale v. HenkelSupreme Court of the United States · 1906
- United States v. Morton Salt Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1950
- Oklahoma Press Publishing Co. v. WallingSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
- Rogers v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1951
- Wilson v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1910
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by31 opinions
- United States v. International Business Machines Corp.District Court, S.D. New York · 1979
- Marion C. Bowman v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1965
- National Labor Relations Board v. Trans Ocean Export Packing, Inc., and Dewayne F. TitusCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1973
- United States v. Gaf Corporation, Eastman Kodak Company, Intervenor-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1979
- Steele v. StateWashington Supreme Court · 1975
26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.