Legal Opinion
Widman v. Johnson
Court of Appeals of Washington
Decided March 29, 1996No. 18147-9-IIPublishedCited by 18 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtMorgan, J.
Ronald Widman claimed against Paige J. Johnson and Hanson Natural Resources Company (Hanson) for personal injuries sustained in an auto accident. Johnson cross-claimed against Hanson. When the trial court granted summary judgment in favor of Hanson, Johnson filed this appeal and Widman cross-appealed. Taking the facts in the light most favorable to the appellants, 1 we affirm.
Hanson is a forest products company with more than 100,000 acres of land in southwestern Washington. To access its land, it maintains more than 1,000 miles of logging roads.
One of Hanson’s logging roads is called the…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Van Dinter v. City of KennewickWashington Supreme Court · 1993
- Gaeta v. Seattle City LightCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1989
- Tennyson v. Plum Creek Timber Co.Court of Appeals of Washington · 1994
- McCarver v. Manson Park and Recreation DistrictWashington Supreme Court · 1979
- Lauritzen v. LauritzenCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1994
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by18 opinions
- Ravenscroft v. Washington Water Power Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1998
- Camicia v. Howard S. Wright Construction Co.Washington Supreme Court · 2014
- Swinehart v. City of SpokaneCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2008
- Swinehart v. City of SpokaneCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2008
- Cultee v. City of TacomaCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1999
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.