Four Winns, Inc. v. Cincinnati Insurance Co.
Indiana Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
STATON, Presiding Judge.
A son of Carol and Franklin Gorman was injured when Carol lost control of a ski boat purchased from North Harbor Marine (NHM) and manufactured by Four Winns, Inc. (Four Winns). When the Gormans filed suit against NHM and Four Winns, Four Winns refused to defend and indemnify NHM; NHM was insured by Cincinnati Insurance Company. NHM filed a cross-claim against Four Winns for indemnification and moved for summary judgment. Before the hearing was held on this summary judgment motion, Four Winns settled the principal lawsuit with the Gormans who then dismissed their suit.
Ev…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Bassett v. GlockIndiana Court of Appeals · 1977
- Hale v. Peabody Coal CompanyIndiana Court of Appeals · 1976
- Poxon v. General Motors Acceptance Corp.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1980
- Coca-Cola Bottling Co.-Goshen v. Vendo Co.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1983
- Maple Chair Co. v. WS Badcock Corp.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1980
3Cited by19 opinions
- Martin Rispens & Son v. Hall Farms, Inc.Indiana Supreme Court · 1993
- Pugh's IGA, Inc. v. Super Food Services, Inc.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1988
- Lawlis v. Kightlinger & GrayIndiana Court of Appeals · 1990
- Lewis v. LockardIndiana Court of Appeals · 1986
- Stackhouse v. ScanlonIndiana Court of Appeals · 1991
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.