Legal Opinion
Hale v. Peabody Coal Company
Indiana Court of Appeals
Decided March 10, 1976No. 1-175A17PublishedCited by 94 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtRobertson, C.J.
The plaintiff-appellant, Hale, brings this appeal from the trial court’s granting of summary judgment in favor of the defendants-appellees, Peabody and Powered.
The sole issue upon appeal is whether summary judgment was properly entered.
We affirm.
The record reveals the following facts: Peabody is engaged in coal mining in Vermillion County at a location known and designated as the Universal Mine. On October 29, 1969, Peabody contracted with Powered to construct certain coal handling facilities at the mine including a conveyor belt system. The system was to consist of a sloping conveyor belt…
2Cases cited27 opinions
- Prest-O-Lite Co. v. SkeelIndiana Supreme Court · 1914
- Neal, Admr. v. Home Builders, Inc.Indiana Supreme Court · 1953
- Podgorny v. Great Central Insurance Co.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1974
- King v. Shelby Rural Electric Cooperative Corp.Court of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1973
- Shaw v. SS Kresge CompanyIndiana Court of Appeals · 1975
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by94 opinions
- Plan-Tec, Inc. v. WigginsIndiana Court of Appeals · 1983
- Bagley v. Insight Communications Co., LPIndiana Supreme Court · 1995
- Perry v. Northern Indiana Public Service Co.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1982
- Jones v. City of LogansportIndiana Court of Appeals · 1982
- Shell Oil Co. v. MeyerIndiana Supreme Court · 1998
89 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.