Legal Opinion
Lewis v. Lockard
Indiana Court of Appeals
Decided October 27, 1986No. 30A01-8605-CV-133PublishedCited by 20 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
NEAL, Judge.
STATEMENT OF THE CASE
Defendant-appellants, Richard Lewis (Lewis) and RAL Engineering and Construction Corporation (RAL), appeal the decision of the Hancock Superior Court, which ruled in favor of plaintiff-appellees, Paul and Dana Lockard, holding that the Lockard's exclusive remedy was not limited to Indiana's Workmen's Compensation Act. The Lockards, as cross-appellants, appeal the trial court's ruling in favor of Lewis and RAL, cross-appellees, regarding Lewis' and RAL's alleged liability as a matter of law for injuries sustained by Paul Lockard. Both rulings were in response…
2Cases cited25 opinions
- Bassett v. GlockIndiana Court of Appeals · 1977
- Hale v. Peabody Coal CompanyIndiana Court of Appeals · 1976
- Thornton Ex Rel. Thornton v. PenderIndiana Supreme Court · 1978
- Jones v. City of LogansportIndiana Court of Appeals · 1982
- Petroski v. Northern Indiana Public Service Co.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1976
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by20 opinions
- Ramon v. Glenroy Const. Co., Inc.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1993
- Rausch v. ReinholdIndiana Court of Appeals · 1999
- William E. Chambers and Beverly Chambers v. Osteonics CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1997
- A Woman's Choice-East Side Women's Clinic v. NewmanDistrict Court, S.D. Indiana · 1995
- Daugherty v. Fuller Engineering Service Corp.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1993
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.