Legal Opinion

Eastern State Hospital v. Graves' Committee

Supreme Court of Virginia

Decided March 1, 1906PublishedCited by 22 opinions

Error to a judgment of the Law and Equity Court of the city of Richmond in a proceeding by motion for a judgment. Judgment for the defendant. Plaintiff assigns error.

1Opinion of the CourtBuchanan, J.

The only question involved in this writ of error is whether or not the statute of limitations runs against the claim sued on, which is for hoard and medical attention furnished Richard C. Graves as an inmate of the Eastern State Hospital.

It is settled law that the statute of limitations, unless the statute expressly so provides, does not run against the State, and that this exemption applies to debts and demands of a personal nature in favor of the State as well as to real estate held by it. Wood on Lim. (3d ed.), sec. 52; Kemp v. Com’th., 1 H. & M. 85; Nimo v. Com’th., 4 H. & M. 57, 4 Am.…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. United States v. Nashville, Chattanooga & St. Louis Railway Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1886
  2. United States v. BeebeSupreme Court of the United States · 1888
  3. United States v. Des Moines Navigation & Railway Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1892
  4. Buntin v. City of DanvilleSupreme Court of Virginia · 1896
  5. Maia's Adm'r v. Eastern State HospitalSupreme Court of Virginia · 1899

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by22 opinions

  1. State Land Board v. LeeOregon Supreme Court · 1917
  2. Shaw v. BushCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1933
  3. Central Hospital for Insane v. AdamsTennessee Supreme Court · 1915
  4. In Re Bogert's WillNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1958
  5. McNutt v. CoxTexas Supreme Court · 1939

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API