Legal Opinion

Mirabella v. Metropolitan Life Insurance

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided October 3, 1940No. Appeal, 77PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Keller, P. J.,

This was an action of assumpsit brought by G-aetano Mirabella against Metropolitan Life Insurance Company on a group insurance contract, insuring its own employees. A certificate — No- 11784 — was issued to him under Group Contract No. 50, entitling him to certain benefits by way of (a) Life Insurance, (b) Temporary Disability Insurance, (c) Total and Permanent Disability Insurance, and (d) Retirement Annuity. The claim here involved is concerned with the third clause (c), which reads as follows:

“(c) TOTAL AND PERMANENT DISABILITY INSURANCE, benefits under which are…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Class & Nachod Brewing Co. v. GiacobelloSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1923
  2. Cooper v. Metropolitan Life InsuranceSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1936
  3. Cooper v. Metropolitan Life InsuranceSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1935
  4. Pearlman v. Metropolitan Life InsuranceSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1939
  5. Sebastianelli v. Prudential Insurance Co. of AmericaSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1940

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Remick v. RemickSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1983
  2. Bowler v. Fidelity & Casualty Co. of NYSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1969
  3. Feigenbaum v. Prudential Insurance Co. of AmericaSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1940
  4. Caulfield v. Aetna Life InsuranceSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1940
  5. Bundy v. National Safety Life InsuranceSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1985

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API