Legal Opinion

Hecker v. Sadler

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided February 11, 1936No. 25361PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Per curiam

This isf an appeal on behalf of the plaintiff in error, B. J. Hecker, from the district court of Oklahoma county. The! plaintiff in error was defendant in the trial court, and (he defendant in error was the plaintiff; we will refer to them as plaintiff and defendant, as they appeared in the trial court.

There seems to be no serious dispute as to the facts in the case. On the 22nd day of May. 1930, the plaintiff instituted an action against several defendants, all of whom were personally served with summons, except the defendant ©. J. Hecker. It was an action to quiet title in the plaintiff to…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Wood v. CallaghanMichigan Supreme Court · 1886
  2. Casco National Bank v. ShawSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1887
  3. MacLean v. ReynoldsSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1928
  4. Johnson v. BrownMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1891

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Stephenson v. HammonsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1957
  2. Weber v. BruceSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1946
  3. Davis v. BallSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1939
  4. Siler v. SilerSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1960
  5. Siler v. SilerSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1960

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API