Boston Scientific Corp. v. Schneider (Europe) AG
District Court, D. Massachusetts
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM AND ORDERS
WOODLOCK, District Judge.
I
These two eases present images from the kaleidoscopic reconfigurations of products, affiliations and litigation undertaken during the past decade by four competitors in the market for medical devices designed to treat clogged coronary arteries.
The first case before me (Civil Action No. 94-10967-DPW) was initiated by Competitor A to establish that its products do not infringe the patent controlled by Competitor B or alternatively that the patent is invalid. Competitor B has counterclaimed alleging infringement.
During the course of this litigation,…
2Cases cited103 opinions
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Allen v. McCurrySupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- MARKMAN Et Al. v. WESTVIEW INSTRUMENTS, INC., Et Al.Supreme Court of the United States · 1996
- Herbert Markman and Positek, Inc. v. Westview Instruments, Inc. And Althon Enterprises, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1995
98 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by21 opinions
- Asahi Glass Co., Ltd. v. Pentech PharmaceuticalsDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 2003
- Santander Consumer USA Inc. v. WalshDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 2010
- Transwitch Corp. v. Galazar Networks, Inc.District Court, D. Massachusetts · 2005
- In Re Tamoxifen Citrate Antitrust LitigationDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 2003
- Eon Laboratories, Inc. v. SmithKline Beecham Corp.District Court, D. Massachusetts · 2003
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.