Legal Opinion
In Re Tamoxifen Citrate Antitrust Litigation
District Court, E.D. New York
Decided May 15, 2003No. MDL NO. 1408 ILGPublishedCited by 12 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
GLASSER, District Judge.
SUMMARY
Plaintiffs are eighteen individuals (the “consumer plaintiffs”), eleven organizations (or their trustees) which provide certain medical benefits for their members (the “third-party payor plaintiffs”), and six consumer advocacy groups representing consumer plaintiffs (the “consumer advocacy plaintiffs”) (collectively, “Plaintiffs”). Plaintiffs bring this action essentially alleging that defendant Zeneca, Inc. (together with co-defendant Astrazeneca Pharmaceuticals LP, “Zeneca”) entered into an agreement with defendant Barr Laboratories, Inc.…
2Cases cited40 opinions
- Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Papasan v. AllainSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Brunswick Corp. v. Pueblo Bowl-O-Mat, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1977
- Zenith Radio Corp. v. Hazeltine Research, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1969
- Eastern Railroad Presidents Conference v. Noerr Motor Freight, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1961
35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Joblove v. Barr Labs. Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2005
- In Re: Cardizem Cd Antitrust Litigation. Louisiana Wholesale Drug Co. v. Hoechst Marion Roussel, Inc., and Andrx Pharmaceuticals, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2003
- Schering-Plough Corp. v. Federal Trade CommissionCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2005
- Asahi Glass Co., Ltd. v. Pentech PharmaceuticalsDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 2003
- In Re Ciprofloxacin Hydrochloride Antitrust LitigationDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 2005
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.