Legal Opinion

Thomas v. Ryan

South Dakota Supreme Court

Decided October 27, 1909PublishedCited by 15 opinions

Appeal from Circuit Court, Spink County. Hon. Chas. S. Whiting, Judge. Action by Z. W. Thomas against J. W. Ryan and another. From a judgment, for defendants, and from an order denying a new trial, plaintiff appeals.

1Opinion of the CourtSmith, J.

Action to cancel a deed because of alleged false and fraudulent representations. A jury was impaneled to try the issues of fact. At the close of. plaintiff’s evidence defendants moved for direction of a verdict on the ground that “plaintiff has failed to prove 'the existence or commission of any fraud,” and for other reasons stated in the motion which we do not deem material to the consideration of the case. As stated in the record, the motion was granted and the action dismissed. No verdict is stated in the abstract, but the court made and filed findings of fact and conclusions of law, and…

2Cited by15 opinions

  1. Peters v. LohrSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1910
  2. Rosebud Sioux Tribe v. StrainSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1988
  3. Nizielski v. TvinnereimSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1990
  4. Skoglund v. StaabSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1981
  5. In re Peck's EstateSupreme Court of Vermont · 1913

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API