Legal Opinion

Seiler v. Whiting

Arizona Supreme Court

Decided November 21, 1938No. Civil No. 3981PublishedCited by 50 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtLockwood, J.

Bosalyn A. Seiler, as executrix of the estate of Fred Seiler, deceased, hereinafter called plaintiff, brought suit against A. C. Whiting, E. I. Whiting, E. J. Whiting and B. E. Whiting, co-partners as Whiting Brothers, and J. A. Whiting, also known as Jay Whiting, hereinafter called defendants, to recover damages for the death of her testator, which she claimed occurred through the negligence of J. A. Whiting. The case was tried before a jury which returned a verdict in favor of defendants, and after the usual motion for new trial was overruled, this appeal was taken.

There are twenty-six…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Mockowik v. Kansas CitySupreme Court of Missouri · 1906
  2. New York Life Insurance v. McNeelyArizona Supreme Court · 1938
  3. Peters v. LohrSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1910

3Cited by50 opinions

  1. Epstein v. Boston Housing AuthorityMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1944
  2. Golonka v. General Motors Corp.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 2003
  3. Butane Corporation v. KirbyArizona Supreme Court · 1947
  4. Morris v. CartwrightNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1953
  5. Alires v. Southern Pacific CompanyArizona Supreme Court · 1963

45 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API