Legal Opinion

Schenley Distilleries, Inc. v. United States

United States Customs Court

Decided April 22, 1952No. C. D. 1406PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

Johnson, Judge:

The question at issue in this case involves the quantity of alcoholic beverages upon which the collector assessed duty in reliquidating the entry in conformity with a decision and judgment of this court. The plaintiff claims that the collector should have assessed duty only upon the quantity subject to the imposition of internal revenue tax by reason of the amendment of paragraph 813 of the Tariff Act of 1930 by Public Law 612, approved June 8, 1948.

At the trial of this case counsel for the plaintiff contended that in reliquidating the entry pursuant to the judgment order of…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Austin, Nichols & Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1949
  2. Hewitt v. PhelpsSupreme Court of the United States · 1882
  3. Maui Dry Goods & Grocery Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1950
  4. Mitsubishi Shoji Kaisha, Ltd. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1942
  5. Alfred Hart Distilleries, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1951

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Schenley Distilleries, Inc. v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1953

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API