Legal Opinion

Mitsubishi Shoji Kaisha, Ltd. v. United States

United States Customs Court

Decided March 18, 1942No. C. D. 603PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Tilson, Judge:

The original protest in this case, addressed to the collector of customs at Los Angeles, makes the following claim:

Your action in assessing duty at 100 per pound under par. 924, is illegal, null and void. No such claim was set forth in the original protests (Nos. 959319G/26888 and 958316-G/27083), nor did the Court decision provide for such assessment.

Upon motion duly made and granted by the court the protest was amended as follows:

It is further claimed that your action in assessing duty at 10 cents per pound under paragraph 924, Tariff Act of 1930, is illegal, null and void…

2Cited by3 opinions

  1. Aris Gloves, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1948
  2. Schenley Distilleries, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1952
  3. Taylor v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1954

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API