Legal Opinion

Alfred Hart Distilleries, Inc. v. United States

United States Customs Court

Decided June 20, 1951No. C. D. 1338PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Johnson, Judge:

In this action the plaintiff contends that the collector failed to follow the judgment of this court rendered respecting a certain quantity of the whisky covered by protest 120705-K, initial number 113267-K, reported in 18 Cust. Ct. 156, Abstract 51550, wherein the claim was sustained that duties should be refunded upon alcoholic beverages lost in transit, as shown by the gauger’s returns verified by an affidavit of the importer.

Within the period granted by statute the collector reviewed his action and reported that there was no allowance in duty for the apparent reason that…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Maui Dry Goods & Grocery Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1950
  2. Schenley Import Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1940
  3. Zanes v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1940

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Paramount Distillers, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1951
  2. Schenley Distilleries, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1952

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API