Legal Opinion
State of Hawaii v. Donald Trump
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided June 12, 2017No. 17-15589PublishedCited by 40 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION 1
2Per curiam
We are asked to delineate the statutory and constitutional limits to the President’s power to control immigration in this appeal of the district court’s order preliminarily enjoining two sections of Executive Order 13780 (“E02” or “the Order”), “Protecting the Nation From Foreign Terrorist Entry Into the United States.” The Immigration and Nationality Act (“INA”) gives the President broad powers to control the entry of aliens, and to take actions to protect the American public. But immigration, even for the President, is not a one-person show. The President’s authority is subject to…
3Cases cited71 opinions
- Lujan v. Defenders of WildlifeSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Winter v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2008
- Spokeo, Inc. v. RobinsSupreme Court of the United States · 2016
- Friends of the Earth, Inc. v. Laidlaw Environmental Services (TOC), Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2000
- Abbott Laboratories v. GardnerSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
66 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
4Cited by40 opinions
- Trump v. HawaiiSupreme Court of the United States · 2018
- Trump. v. International Refugee Assistance ProjectSupreme Court of the United States · 2017
- Intl Refugee Assistance v. Donald TrumpCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2020
- Ryan Karnoski v. Donald TrumpCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2019
- State of Hawaii v. Donald TrumpCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2017
35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.