Legal Opinion

Morgan v. State Farm Life Insurance

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided March 24, 1965PublishedCited by 22 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtGoodwin, J.

This is an action at law to recover benefits under an alleged contract of insurance on the life of plaintiff’s deceased husband. Defendant appeals from a judgment on a verdict for plaintiff.

Plaintiff bases her claim on the terms of an instrument entitled “CONDITIONAL BINDING RECEIPT.” The face of this instrument reads as follows:

“RECEIVED PROM Rudy Lee Morgan

(Amount of cash

settlement received) $ 37.65 in connection with the initial premium on the proposed insurance for *115which an application is this day made to the State Farm Life Insurance Company ON THE LIFE OF

(Name of Proposed Insured) Rudy…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Ransom v. Penn Mutual Life InsuranceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1954
  2. Headley v. United Fidelity Hospital Assurance Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1963

3Cited by22 opinions

  1. Davis v. M.L.G. Corp.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1986
  2. Grandpre v. Northwestern Insurance Life Insurance Co.South Dakota Supreme Court · 1977
  3. Vargas v. Pacific National Life Assurance CompanyNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1968
  4. Brown v. Equitable Life InsuranceWisconsin Supreme Court · 1973
  5. Davenport Peters Co. v. Royal Globe InsuranceDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 1980

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API