Legal Opinion
School Committee v. Boston Teachers Union, Local 66
Massachusetts Appeals Court
Decided October 29, 1987No. 87-260PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
*904The arbitrator’s reinstatement order is beyond his authority because it purports to designate grievants “to positions they had not previously occupied and for which the school committee had not found them qualified .’’School Comm. of Holbrook v. Holbrook Educ. Assn., 395 Mass. 651, 656 (1985). School Comm. of Peabody v. International Union of Elec., Radio & Mach. Workers, Local 294, 19 Mass. App. Ct. 449,453-454 (1985). The statutory sources upon which the decisions rest are G. L. c. 71, §§ 31 and 38. See also Berkshire Hills Regional Sch. Dist. Comm. v. Berkshire Hills Educ. Assn., 375 Mass.…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Berkshire Hills Regional School District Committee v. Berkshire Hills Education Ass'nMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1978
- Sch. Comm. of W. Bridgewater v. W. Bridgewater Tchrs'Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1977
- School Committee of Waltham v. Waltham Educators Ass'nMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1986
- School Committee of Holbrook v. Holbrook Educ. Ass'nMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1985
- Old Rochester Regional Teacher's Club v. Old Rochester Regional School District CommitteeMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1986
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Higher Education Coordinating Council v. Massachusetts Teachers' Ass'nMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1996
- City of Fall River v. Teamsters Union, Local 526Massachusetts Appeals Court · 1989
- Massachusetts Board of Higher Education v. Massachusetts Teachers Ass'nMassachusetts Appeals Court · 2011
- Massachusetts Board of Higher Education v. Massachusetts Teachers Ass'nMassachusetts Superior Court · 2005