Legal Opinion
Cicone v. URS Corp.
California Court of Appeal
Decided July 10, 1986No. F004334PublishedCited by 64 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
MARTIN, J.
This is an appeal from a judgment of dismissal following the sustaining of a general demurrer to an original cross-complaint without leave to amend.
On June 10,1983, plaintiffs Gerald D. Lucas, Janice H. Lucas, and Lucas Family Trust filed a complaint alleging legal malpractice against defendants Frank J. Cicone and Frank J. Cicone Law Corporation et al. On October 25, 1983, defendants answered the complaint and filed a cross-complaint for comparative equitable indemnity, damages and punitive damages against URS Corporation, Arthur H. Stromberg and Richard W. Canady.
Cross-defen…
2Cases cited36 opinions
- Glanzer v. . ShepardNew York Court of Appeals · 1922
- American Motorcycle Assn. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1978
- Biakanja v. IrvingCalifornia Supreme Court · 1958
- Lucas v. HammCalifornia Supreme Court · 1961
- Vesely v. SagerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1971
31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by64 opinions
- LiMandri v. JudkinsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1997
- Olson v. Major League BaseballCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2022
- McGonigle v. CombsCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1992
- Conrad v. Bank of AmericaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1996
- GEM Developers v. Hallcraft Homes of San Diego, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1989
59 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.