Hicks Rubber Co., Dist. v. Harper
Texas Supreme Court
1Per curiam
We have concluded that a correct judgment was entered by the Court of Civil Appeals in this cause and, for that reason, dismiss the application for writ of error; but we deem it advisable to take notice of one particular holding of the Court of Civil Appeals, least it create confusion with respect to an important question of practice. This language appears in the opinion of the Court of Civil Appeals (131 S. W. (2d) 749) :
“It was held by the Supreme Court in the case of Texas & N. O. Ry. Co. v. Crow, (132 Texas, 465) 123 S. W. (2d) 649, par. 8, that the failure of the. trial court to define a…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Robertson & Mueller v. HoldenTexas Commission of Appeals · 1928
- Texas & N. O. R. v. CrowTexas Supreme Court · 1939
- Hicks Rubber Co. v. HarperCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1939
3Cited by10 opinions
- Traders & General Insurance v. Hicks Rubber Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1943
- Cannon v. PearsonTexas Supreme Court · 1964
- Galvan v. FedderCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1984
- Hoke v. PoserTexas Supreme Court · 1964
- Employers Casualty Co. v. Hicks Rubber Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1942
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.