Legal Opinion

Plymouth Rubber Co. v. West Coast Rubber Co.

Washington Supreme Court

Decided December 12, 1924No. 18652PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBridges, J.

A demurrer to the complaint having been sustained, the plaintiff refused to further plead, and has appealed from á judgment dismissing the action.

The complaint alleges the following facts: Plymouth Rubber Company (predecessor in interests of the appellant) did business in Massachusetts, and the respondent in the state of Washington. Prior to December 1,1920, the respondent had purchased and received from the Plymouth Company a certain quantity of Toesans, and thereby became indebted to it in the sum of $6,778.95. As of December 3, 1920, respondent wrote the Plymouth Company the following…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. LeDoux v. Seattle North Pacific Shipbuilding Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1921
  2. Ingram v. SausetWashington Supreme Court · 1922
  3. First National Bank v. White-Dulaney Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1923
  4. Thayer v. HarbicanWashington Supreme Court · 1912

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Perez v. PappasWashington Supreme Court · 1983
  2. Graham v. New York Life InsuranceWashington Supreme Court · 1935
  3. Sawyer v. Somers Lumber Co.Montana Supreme Court · 1929
  4. Seattle Investors Syndicate v. West Dependable StoresWashington Supreme Court · 1934
  5. Inman v. W. E. Roche Fruit Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1931

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API