Legal Opinion
Goldstein v. Town of Bedford
Supreme Court of New Hampshire
Decided November 22, 2006No. 2005-598PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtBroderick, C.J.
The plaintiff, Arnold Goldstein, appeals an order of the Superior Court (Conboy, J.) dismissing his mandamus petition for lack of standing. We affirm.
In January 2005, the plaintiff, a resident and taxpayer in the town of Bedford (town), notified town officials that defendant Christopher Evans had allegedly violated the zoning ordinance governing the merger of two non-conforming lots. The town’s zoning administrator investigated the matter, contacted the town’s legal counsel, and decided against pursuing an enforcement action.
In March, the plaintiff filed an appeal with the Bedford Zoning…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Silva v. BotschSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1980
- Weeks Restaurant Corp. v. City of DoverSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1979
- Ossipee Auto Parts, Inc. v. Ossipee Planning BoardSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1991
- Nautilus of Exeter, Inc. v. Town of ExeterSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1995
- Caspersen v. Town of LymeSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1995
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- State v. HynesSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2009
- Anderson v. Motorsports Holdings, LLCSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2007
- Union Leader Corp. v. New Hampshire Retirement SystemSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2011
- Golf Course Investors of NH, LLC v. Town of JaffreySupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2011
- Babiarz v. Town of GraftonSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2007
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.