Wendling Lumber Co. v. Glenwood Lumber Co.
California Court of Appeal
The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtSturtevant, J.
The plaintiff sold to J. H. Routt a quantity of lumber for which he failed to pay the plaintiff. Routt sold the lumber to the defendant. Contending that it had .been wronged, the plaintiff sued the defendant under a charge of conversion. At the end of the plaintiff’s case the defendant moved for a nonsuit. The motion was granted and the plaintiff has appealed.
The case was appealed twice before this appeal. (Wendling etc. Co. v. Glenwood, etc. Co., 153 Cal. 411 [95 Pac. 1029]; Id., 19 Cal. App. 1 [124 Pac. 734].) The first of those cases states that the rule of procedure declared in Moore v.…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- McNeil v. . the Tenth National BankNew York Court of Appeals · 1871
- Moore v. CoppCalifornia Supreme Court · 1897
- Hart v. ChurchCalifornia Supreme Court · 1899
- Wendling Lumber Co. v. Glenwood Lumber Co.California Supreme Court · 1908
- Kohn v. Sacramento Electric, Gas Ry. Co.California Supreme Court · 1914
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Jones v. Commercial Investment TrustUtah Supreme Court · 1924
- Meadows v. Hampton Live Stock Commission Co.California Court of Appeal · 1942
- Keegan v. Kaufman Bros.California Court of Appeal · 1945
- Hanscome-James-Winship v. AingerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1925
- Asp v. LowryCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1953
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.