Legal Opinion

State Ex Rel. Taliaferro v. Baskin

Supreme Court of Florida

Decided December 4, 1933PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Per curiam

The defense to the alternative writ of mandamus in this case is that the respondents, city officials of Clearwater, Florida, should not be.required to revise the budget of the city for the fiscal year 1933-1934 so as to provide for and appropriate therein for the payment of relator’s bonds, a sum equal to all past due principal, interest coupons delinquent and current interest to fall due, because, pursuant to a previously issued peremptory writ of mandamus emanating from this Court,, a tax levy sufficient, if collected, to pay relator’s bonds, was made last year although not collected.

The…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Klemm v. DavenportSupreme Court of Florida · 1930
  2. State Ex Rel. Dos Anigos, Inc. v. LehmanSupreme Court of Florida · 1930
  3. Norris v. Montezuma Valley Irr. Dist.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1918
  4. Fisher v. City of CharlestonWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1881
  5. State ex rel. Soutter v. Common Council of the MadisonWisconsin Supreme Court · 1861

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Baskin v. KlemmSupreme Court of Florida · 1935
  2. Treat v. State Ex Rel. DannSupreme Court of Florida · 1935
  3. State Ex Rel. Kinsella v. Florida State Racing CommissionSupreme Court of Florida · 1944
  4. State ex rel. Crane v. City of LakelandSupreme Court of Florida · 1934
  5. State Ex Rel. Sherrill v. MilamSupreme Court of Florida · 1933

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API