Legal Opinion
State Ex Rel. Kinsella v. Florida State Racing Commission
Supreme Court of Florida
Decided December 22, 1944PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
CHAPMAN, J.:
This is a case of original jurisdiction. The relator, Harry Kinsella, as agent and organization manager of the Daytona Jockey Club, by petition, represented that a large number of individuals desired to construct and operate a horse race track at Daytona Beach, Florida; that the association of individuals filed with the State Racing Commission an application for a permit under the several provisions of Chapter 550, Fla. Stats. 1941 (FSA). The State Racing Commission refused or declined to issue the permit,' and predicated on the aforesaid petition, we issued to it an alternative…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- State Ex Rel. Sherrill v. MilamSupreme Court of Florida · 1933
- State Ex Rel. Mason v. RoseSupreme Court of Florida · 1936
- State Ex Rel. Pinellas Kennel Club, Inc. v. State Racing CommissionSupreme Court of Florida · 1934
- State Ex Rel. Hollywood Jockey Club, Inc. v. SteinSupreme Court of Florida · 1938
- State Ex Rel. Fronton Exhibition Co. v. SteinSupreme Court of Florida · 1940
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Gulfstream Park Racing Assoc. Inc. v. Div. of Pari-Mut. WageringDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1981
- State Ex Rel. Palm Beach Jockey Club, Inc. v. Florida State Racing CommissionSupreme Court of Florida · 1946
- State Ex Rel. Volusia Jai-Alai, Inc. v. BD OF BUS. REG.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1974
- State ex rel. Magnolia Park, Inc. v. Louisiana State Racing CommissionSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1956