Upjohn Company v. Finch
District Court, W.D. Michigan
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
KENT, Chief Judge.
This action arises under the Federal Food, Drug and Cosmetic Act, 52 Stat. 1040 (1938), as amended; 21 U.S.C.A. § 301 et seq. (hereinafter the Act) and the Administrative Procedure Act, § 9, 5 U.S.C.A. § 558. The plaintiff asserts that this Court has jurisdiction of this cause pursuant to the provisions of Title 28 U.S.C.A. § 1331; 28 U.S.C.A. § 1337; 28 U.S.C.A. §§ 2201, 2202 and Section 10 of the Administrative Procedure Act, 5 U.S.C.A. §§ 701-706. Plaintiff asserts that venue is in this Court pursuant to the provisions of 28 U.S.C.A. § 1391(e) (4).
FACTS
Plaintiff is…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- Abbott Laboratories v. GardnerSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Myers v. Bethlehem Shipbuilding Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1938
- Neirbo Co. v. Bethlehem Shipbuilding Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1939
- The Toilet Goods Association, Inc. v. John w.ga Rdner, Secretary of Health, Education, and WelfareSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Fourco Glass Co. v. Transmirra Products Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1957
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by25 opinions
- Pharmaceutical Manufacturers Association v. FinchDistrict Court, D. Delaware · 1970
- The Upjohn Company v. Robert H. Finch, Secretary of Health, Education & Welfare, and Herbert L. Ley, Jr., Commissioner of Food and DrugsCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1970
- General Motors Corporation v. VolpeDistrict Court, D. Delaware · 1970
- Seariver Maritime Financial Holdings, Inc. v. PenaDistrict Court, S.D. Texas · 1996
- Caremark Therapeutic Services v. LeavittDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2006
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.