Legal Opinion
MIG, Inc. v. Paul, Weiss, Rifkind, Wharton & Garrison, L.L.P.
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided March 29, 2010No. 09 Civ. 5593(RJS)PublishedCited by 16 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION AND ORDER
RICHARD J. SULLIVAN, District Judge.
Plaintiff MIG, Inc. brings this action against Defendant Paul, Weiss, Rifkind, Wharton & Garrison, L.L.P. for legal malpractice and other tortious conduct in connection with the 1997 creation of a series of MIG, Inc. preferred stock. Now before the Court is Defendant’s motion to dismiss the Complaint against it because all claims are either barred by the applicable statute of limitations or fail to state a claim upon which relief can be granted. For the reasons set forth below, Defendant’s motion is granted.
I. Background
Plaintiff MIG, Inc.…
2Cases cited30 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- ATSI Communications, Inc. v. Shaar Fund, Ltd.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2007
- Rombach v. ChangCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2004
- McCoy v. FeinmanNew York Court of Appeals · 2002
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- Windsor Securities, LLC v. Arent Fox LLPDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2017
- HIPPLE v. McFaddenCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2011
- Neogenix Oncology, Inc. v. GordonDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 2015
- Brown v. AutomatticDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2021
- Hipple v. McFaddenCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2011
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.