Legal Opinion

Neogenix Oncology, Inc. v. Gordon

District Court, E.D. New York

Decided September 30, 2015No. 14-CV-4427 JFB AKTPublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

JOSEPH F. BIANCO, District Judge:

This action arises from a company’s efforts to raise capital by offering financial incentives to intermediaries who attracted investors. Plaintiff Neogenix Oncology, Inc., (“Neogenix,” the “Company,” or “plaintiff’) brings this action' against its former attorneys and executives, alleging that they knowingly permitted the Company to raise money by paying finders’ fees to unlicensed brokers. According to Neo-genix, this illegal fundraising program, known as the “Finder Fee Program” (“FFP”), ultimately drove the company into bankruptcy,…

2Cases cited57 opinions

  1. Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  2. Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  3. EBC I, Inc. v. Goldman, Sachs & Co.New York Court of Appeals · 2005
  4. Brandon Cleveland and Isiah Jackson v. Caplaw Enterprises, Docket No. 05-4643-CvCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2006
  5. Kaufman v. CohenAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2003

52 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Honig v. KornfeldDistrict Court, S.D. Florida · 2018
  2. Guzman v. Concavage Marine Construction Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 2016
  3. Abrahami v. Meister Seelig & Fein LLPDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2022
  4. Core-Mark Midcontinent, Inc. v. Tri-State Candy Wholesale, Inc.District Court, E.D. New York · 2023
  5. Global Auto, Inc. v. HitrinovDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 2021

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API