Legal Opinion

Thorne v. Gay

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided July 27, 1988No. 86-264-L; CA A43317PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDeits, J.

On cross-motions for summary judgment, the trial court held that plaintiff 1 is collaterally estopped from asserting a civil claim against defendant for the recovery of unlawfully obtained unemployment insurance benefits and entered judgment for defendant. Plaintiff assigns as error the granting of defendant’s motion for summary judgment and the denial of its motion. We reverse and remand.

On March 8,1982, plaintiff issued an administrative decision that defendant had unlawfully obtained unemployment insurance benefits of $2,220, and was liable for that amount. Defendant did not seek…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. State v. DillonOregon Supreme Court · 1981
  2. State v. RatliffOregon Supreme Court · 1987
  3. Cochran v. ConnellCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1981
  4. State Ex Rel. State Board of Higher Education v. Northwestern Pacific Indemnity Co.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 1984

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Teggatz v. RinglebSupreme Court of Iowa · 2000
  2. Ives v. INA Life InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1990
  3. Church Mutual Insurance v. RisonCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 1991

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API