Legal Opinion
Bishop v. Bordonaro
Connecticut Appellate Court
Decided September 19, 1989No. 7360PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtO’Connell, J.
This is an appeal from the decision of the Superior Court affirming, after a trial de novo, the order of the Probate Court to sell real estate.
*60On August 17, 1987, the defendant administratrix applied to the Probate Court for authority to sell the deceased’s house in Cromwell. On September 17,1987, that court held a duly noticed hearing on the application to sell the house to the plaintiffs, Richard and Sharon Bishop, who had signed a contract with the administratrix to buy the house for $155,000. At the hearing, the Probate Court chose instead to order a sale to the intervening defendant,…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Ardmare Construction Co. v. FreedmanSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1983
- Baskin's Appeal from ProbateSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1984
- State v. HeinzSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1984
- Slattery v. WoodinSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1915
- State v. PiersonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1988
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Hall v. SchoenwetterSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1996
- Adolphson v. WeinsteinConnecticut Appellate Court · 2001
- Esposito v. Estate of Baranowsky, No. 64950 (Jun. 24, 1992)Connecticut Superior Court · 1992
- In re Probate Appeal of Cadle Co.Connecticut Appellate Court · 2014
- Kelly v. Estate of Coughlin, No. 087847 (Mar. 14, 1991)Connecticut Superior Court · 1991
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.