Legal Opinion
United States v. Pulido-Jacobo
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
Decided August 5, 2004No. 19-3212PublishedCited by 45 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
TACHA, Chief Circuit Judge.
A jury found Defendant-Appellants Samuel Pulido-Jacobo and Esequiel Puli-do-Pedrosa (collectively “the Pulidos”) guilty of possessing with intent to distribute, and conspiracy to possess with intent to distribute, methamphetamine. On appeal, they claim four errors: (1) insufficient evidence of guilt, (2) improper admission of evidence, (3) improper denial of their mistrial motion, and (4) prosecutorial misconduct. We take jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1291 and AFFIRM.
I. BACKGROUND
A Wyoming Highway Patrol officer stopped a car driven by Mr. Pulido-Pedro-sa for…
2Cases cited26 opinions
- Chapman v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Gozlon-Peretz v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
- United States v. Pamela Jones, Katresa Marie Johnson, Mark J. Scott, Jr.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1995
- United States v. Wallace HooksCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1986
- United States v. EvansCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1992
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by45 opinions
- United States v. PoeCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2009
- United States v. AppersonCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2006
- United States v. VerbickasCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2006
- United States v. RogersCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2009
- United States v. HamiltonCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2005
40 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.