Legal Opinion

United States v. Poe

Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit

Decided March 3, 2009No. 07-6237PublishedCited by 92 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

LUCERO, Circuit Judge.

This case requires us to answer a question of first impression in this Circuit: Do bounty hunters constitute state actors for purposes of the Fourth Amendment when they conduct a search in the course of seeking out a bail-jumper? We conclude that bounty hunters do not qualify as state actors when, as here, they act without the assistance of law enforcement and for their own pecuniary interests.

Aaron Dale Poe was apprehended by bounty hunters after he jumped bail in an Oklahoma state criminal case. In the home where Poe was found, the bounty hunters discovered drugs,…

2Cases cited41 opinions

  1. Lugar v. Edmondson Oil Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1982
  2. United States v. JacobsenSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  3. Minnesota v. OlsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
  4. Burdeau v. McDowellSupreme Court of the United States · 1921
  5. Minnesota v. CarterSupreme Court of the United States · 1999

36 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by92 opinions

  1. United States v. AckermanCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2016
  2. United States v. WardellCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2009
  3. United States v. BenoitCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2013
  4. United States v. McHughCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2011
  5. State v. TalkingtonSupreme Court of Kansas · 2015

87 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API