Legal Opinion
United States v. Anthony Provenzano, in No. 79-1912, and Thomas Andretta, in No. 79-1913
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
Decided August 21, 1979No. 79-1912, 79-1913PublishedCited by 77 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
ADAMS, Circuit Judge.
The present appeal raises important questions concerning motions for bail pending review of judgments of conviction.
It is this nation’s policy that one convicted of a crime shall be entitled to bail while appealing his conviction, unless no set of conditions upon release will reasonably assure that he will not flee or pose a danger to the community. 1 Here, the district court denied two motions for release on bail pending appeal solely on the second of these grounds, namely, that no set of conditions could assure that the defendants, if left free,…
2Cases cited44 opinions
- Singer v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
- Sibbach v. Wilson & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1941
- Davis v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Harlan v. McGourinSupreme Court of the United States · 1910
- Harris v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
39 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by77 opinions
- United States v. Anthony Provenzano, Stephen Andretta, and Thomas AndrettaCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1980
- United States v. Robert P. DelkerCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1985
- United States v. Antonio Jose Hurtado, Mark Anthony Olson, Diego Alonzo Flores-Soto, Hector Albert Rua and Jose Pita AndradeCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1985
- United States v. Amir Masoud MotamediCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1985
- United States v. John Anthony OliverCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1982
72 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.