United States v. Antonio Jose Hurtado, Mark Anthony Olson, Diego Alonzo Flores-Soto, Hector Albert Rua and Jose Pita Andrade
Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER.
JOHNSON, Circuit Judge:
This matter makes it appropriate that we render for this Circuit a first interpretation of the provisions of the Bail Reform Act of 1984, 18 U.S.C.A. § 3141 et seq. (1985). For the reasons stated herein, we find that the petitioners have demonstrated procedural error sufficient to require that we GRANT the motion for review of the order below and that we REVERSE and REMAND this matter for further consideration in light of the principles we today articulate.
I
In August of this year a light airplane arrived at the airport in Sylvania, Georgia. Federal…
2Cases cited41 opinions
- Gerstein v. PughSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- United States v. NixonSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Russello v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Tennessee Valley Authority v. HillSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Giordenello v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1958
36 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by111 opinions
- Kaley v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2014
- Donald B. Jackson v. Shirley Chater, Commissioner of Social SecurityCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1996
- United States v. Montalvo-MurilloSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
- United States v. Ronald Tobin, Clifford Roger Ackerson, United States of America v. Ronald TobinCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1991
- United States v. Carmen A. TortoraCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1990
106 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.