Chahla v. City of St. Paul
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
BRUCE C. STONE, Judge. *
Appellant challenges the trial court’s denial of his motion for a continuance and the subsequent dismissal of his action with prejudice for his alleged failure to be prepared for trial. Appellant has also moved to strike portions of respondent’s brief and appendix. We reverse and remand.
FACTS
Appellant Elia Chahla commenced this discrimination action in December 1988 against respondents, the City of St. Paul and various city officials, alleging he was denied homeowner rehabilitation contracts because of his race and national origin.
Appellant filed a Note Of Issue…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Mattfeld v. NesterSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1948
- Plowman v. Copeland, Buhl & Co., Ltd.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1977
- Thanos v. MitchellCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1959
- Bonhiver v. Fugelso, Porter, Simich & Whiteman, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1984
- Feaster v. FeasterDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1976
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Palladium Holdings, LLC v. Zuni Mortgage Loan Trust 2006-OA1Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 2009
- State v. KeetonCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1997
- Minnesota Humane Society v. Minnesota Federated Humane SocietiesCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2000
- In the Matter of the Conservatorship of: Catherine C. Chapman, Protected Person.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 2014
- Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. v. Scott H. Lansing, John Doe and Mary RoweCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2015