Legal Opinion

Chahla v. City of St. Paul

Court of Appeals of Minnesota

Decided October 19, 1993No. C0-93-788PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

BRUCE C. STONE, Judge. *

Appellant challenges the trial court’s denial of his motion for a continuance and the subsequent dismissal of his action with prejudice for his alleged failure to be prepared for trial. Appellant has also moved to strike portions of respondent’s brief and appendix. We reverse and remand.

FACTS

Appellant Elia Chahla commenced this discrimination action in December 1988 against respondents, the City of St. Paul and various city officials, alleging he was denied homeowner rehabilitation contracts because of his race and national origin.

Appellant filed a Note Of Issue…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Mattfeld v. NesterSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1948
  2. Plowman v. Copeland, Buhl & Co., Ltd.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1977
  3. Thanos v. MitchellCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1959
  4. Bonhiver v. Fugelso, Porter, Simich & Whiteman, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1984
  5. Feaster v. FeasterDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1976

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Palladium Holdings, LLC v. Zuni Mortgage Loan Trust 2006-OA1Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 2009
  2. State v. KeetonCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1997
  3. Minnesota Humane Society v. Minnesota Federated Humane SocietiesCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2000
  4. In the Matter of the Conservatorship of: Catherine C. Chapman, Protected Person.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 2014
  5. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. v. Scott H. Lansing, John Doe and Mary RoweCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2015

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API