Matusow Manufacturing Co. v. Weinraub
Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas
1Opinion of the Court
Alessandroni, J.,
Plaintiff instituted its action in equity by summons. Thereafter a petition was filed praying for a rule on defendants to show cause why plaintiff should not have discovery under the then Equity Rule 35, now Pa. R. C. P. 4001 et seq. The petition averred that plaintiff employed one Emanuel Steinberg as a salesman; that Steinberg sold merchandise to defendants outside the normal channels of business, that defendants purchased the merchandise with the knowledge that the salesman lacked the authority to make such sales; that the only record of the extent of the purchases is in…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Sinclair Refining Co. v. Jenkins Petroleum Process Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1933
- Peoples City Bank v. John Hancock Mutual Life InsuranceSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1945
- Yorkshire Worsted Mills v. National Transit Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1937
- Sherwood Bros., Inc. v. Yellow Cab Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1925
- Compton v. International Harvester Co. of AmericaSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1929
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- McNeil v. JordanSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2006
- McNeil v. JordanSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2006