Legal Opinion

Yorkshire Worsted Mills v. National Transit Co.

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided January 12, 1937No. Appeal, 58PublishedCited by 23 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Mr. Chief Justice Kephart,

Appellee brought this action to recover damages resulting from oil escaping from appellant’s pipe line which entered appellee’s dyeing plant, causing injury to the machinery and to cloth in the process of dyeing. Both sides asked for permission, to inspect the other’s plant and system which was granted. Each side filed a bill for discovery with interrogatories. Appellee’s interrogatories were designed to elicit information concerning the operation of the line, the age of the pipe, and the amount of oil that escaped. Its prayer was granted. Appellant then…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Carpenter v. WinnSupreme Court of the United States · 1911
  2. General Film Co. v. SamplinerCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1916
  3. Sherwood Bros., Inc. v. Yellow Cab Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1925
  4. Lesser v. HenrySuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1912
  5. Kinney v. RiceDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 1916

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by23 opinions

  1. Peoples City Bank v. John Hancock Mutual Life InsuranceSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1945
  2. Young v. Bradford County Telephone Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1942
  3. Lomish v. Morris Nimelstein Sportswear Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1951
  4. Liegey Trustee v. Clearfield Tex.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1941
  5. Whetsel v. ShawSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1941

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API