Legal Opinion

In re Knox

Supreme Court of New Jersey

Decided July 13, 1984PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Per curiam

Our painstaking independent review of the record leads us to the same conclusion as was reached by the Disciplinary Review Board (DRB), namely, that respondent should be suspended from the practice of law for a period of three years, with certain conditions to be imposed should readmission be granted. The DRB’s report, which, with a single exception referred to below, we now adopt as our own, is as follows:

“This matter is before the Board on an appeal by the Division of Ethics and Professional Services following dismissal by the District XI Ethics Committee of an ethics complaint that charged…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. In Re WilsonSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1979
  2. In Re DitriSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1976
  3. In Re PowerSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1977
  4. In Re RabbSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1977
  5. In Re FruchterSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1974

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Henry v. New Jersey Department of Human ServicesSupreme Court of New Jersey · 2010
  2. Henry v. New Jersey Department of Human ServicesSupreme Court of New Jersey · 2010

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API