Legal Opinion

In Re Ditri

Supreme Court of New Jersey

Decided October 6, 1976PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Pee Cubiam.

This is a disciplinary proceeding against an attorney. Numerous complaints of professional misconduct were filed against respondent charging him, in the main, with misuse and misappropriation of substantial trust funds. An audit of respondent’s records under the auspices of the Central Ethics Unit in the Administrative Office of the Courts had disclosed the failure to maintain a trust account or adequate books and records as required by B. 1:21-6, and the issuance of numerous checks in connection with his practice of law which were returned marked "insufficient funds” or “account…

2Cited by7 opinions

  1. State of Oklahoma, Ex Rel. Oklahoma Bar Ass'n v. GasawaySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1993
  2. In Re a Member of the Bar of the Supreme Court of the State LassenSupreme Court of Delaware · 1996
  3. In re KnoxSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1984
  4. Henry v. New Jersey Department of Human ServicesSupreme Court of New Jersey · 2010
  5. Henry v. New Jersey Department of Human ServicesSupreme Court of New Jersey · 2010

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API