Legal Opinion

In Re Power

Supreme Court of New Jersey

Decided March 8, 1977PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Pee Curiam.

The record before the Monmouth County Ethics Committee satisfactorily establishes the following facts.

Respondent represented Rosemor Land Development Co. (Rosemor) in the negotiation and making of a contract whereby Rosemor agreed to sell certain lands • to Poet’s Dream, Inc. The contract contained a number of conditions to be performed on Rosemor’s- part and a requirement for a down payment of $10,000 by the purchaser, to be.held in escrow by respondent in an interest-bearing account. Such á trust savings account was opened by respondent with the deposit money on April 30, 1974.…

2Cited by7 opinions

  1. Matter of PerezSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1986
  2. In Re PowerSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1982
  3. Matter of PowerSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1989
  4. In re KnoxSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1984
  5. Henry v. New Jersey Department of Human ServicesSupreme Court of New Jersey · 2010

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API