Legal Opinion

Law Offices of Stockler, PC v. Semaan

Michigan Court of Appeals

Decided June 19, 1984No. Docket 71681PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Per curiam

Defendant appeals as of right from an order entered in the Oakland County Circuit Court which denied his motion to set aside a default and default judgment entered against him.

On August 23, 1982, plaintiff filed a complaint seeking quantum meruit recovery for legal services rendered on behalf of defendant. In Count I of the complaint, plaintiff alleged that it had a contingency fee arrangement with defendant providing that if plaintiff saved defendant any money in a $94,652.28 bankruptcy counterclaim action against him defendant would pay plaintiff 1/3 of such savings. The counterclaim…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. White v. SadlerMichigan Supreme Court · 1957
  2. Ambrose v. the Detroit Edison Co.Michigan Court of Appeals · 1975
  3. Deeb v. BerriMichigan Court of Appeals · 1982
  4. First Bank of Cadillac v. BensonMichigan Court of Appeals · 1978
  5. Midwest Mental Health Clinic, PC v. Blue Cross & Blue ShieldMichigan Court of Appeals · 1982

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Cassandra Dean, a Minor, and Tommy Dean, Next Friend, James R. Bandy and James R. Bandy, P.C., Intervening v. Holiday Inns, Inc., an Ohio CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1988
  2. Plunkett & Cooney, Pc v. Capitol Bancorp LtdMichigan Court of Appeals · 1995
  3. Reynolds v. PolenMichigan Court of Appeals · 1997
  4. Morris v. City of DetroitMichigan Court of Appeals · 1991
  5. Hermann, Cahn & Schneider v. VinyOhio Court of Appeals · 1987

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API